About the PK Protection

Discussion in 'Archive' started by KilluaYoukai, Jul 20, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 2
  1. Java

    Java Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here is an idea :)... how about we make all maps non pvp for a week or two and that way there will only be KS for spots and not just pk...it would show everyone what KS should be like and not just walk into spot and pk out.

    Even though this would be good for botters...it would be fun to see who can KS and who will continue to just pk for spots :)
     
    Java, Jul 26, 2013
    #21
  2. Enderx

    Enderx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2013
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]​
     
    Enderx, Jul 26, 2013
    #22
    Offspring and DARKSEID like this.
  3. Gix

    Gix Innovate, Don't Imitate Founder

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    61,822
    Likes Received:
    6,426
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gix, Sep 2, 2013
    #23
  4. fijhong11

    fijhong11 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    why just we have a non pvp server for begginners and pvp server for those all the want is to ks.
     
    fijhong11, Sep 13, 2013
    #24
  5. Gix

    Gix Innovate, Don't Imitate Founder

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    61,822
    Likes Received:
    6,426
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The answer is easy, the population would split between two servers and this would suck even more as there won't be any competition at all and the game will become boring as hell. By default, MU is PvP actually

    Also we are able to use pvp+non-pvp on same server so why not taking advantage of this feature.

    Please do NOT bump old threads again. You have a thread for suggestions here > http://forum.gamesymbol.com/f549/opinions-needed-527369/index3.html#post747925
     
    Gix, Sep 13, 2013
    #25
Page 2 of 2
    • Thread Status:
    Not open for further replies.