Guardian

Discussion in 'Archive' started by Java, Apr 9, 2013.

  1. Java

    Java Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    While talking with several people in the game i have come to the conclusion that we need to talk about the Guardian from vote shop. As we all know it makes it very hard to kill RF for that 1 day that they have it, if we could do something to decrease either the absorb from it or even make it so the guardian only has hp and not time span it would allow people a better chance to pvp with a RF without having an Uber pro set.

    Thoughts, concerns, problems?
     
    DARKSEID likes this.
  2. jamescicio

    jamescicio Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    28
    I believe that if removing the guardian shall occur , then castle siege should be neutral because it was claimed while using those guardians and it would be unfair .

    I know your intent is good but the people who are screaming this are those who fear losing their castle , so if they want to quit the guardians then they should also forfeit their castle .

    Of course the angel is a major factor in vulcanus , because it absorbs 60 % of dmg thus leading to Killer reaching 2500 kills in there which is disgusting and they cant say they pked me an old player because i don't even level up in there , they pk the new players that want to level up and not participate in their small establishment.

    Either way , the server will get on the right track with the right suggestions . So keep it clean ( to all the haters ).
     
  3. Java

    Java Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My sm is in your ally and i am saying this because the 1 day thing with the guardian makes it so easy for pkers to pk without having trouble of being killed...i don't want guardian removed...but instead change from 1 day to having hp like guardian angel
     
  4. wild1988

    wild1988 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2013
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My input : leave guardian as it is, just fix his absorb to the number which is stated.
     
  5. Terrafrit

    Terrafrit Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Your inputs are useless. The absorb cannot be lowered.

    It can, though, be removed from x shop.
     
  6. PingPong

    PingPong Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you remove spirit though, then Kalima 6, 7 will have to be weakened.

    I like the idea of removing Spirit from shop though, duels are so much more fun without Spirit.

    SMs don't need too much love, they just need high skill. KeDoc's SM can kill me with some teleport magic. It's hard though, but well hard is more rewarding :)
     
  7. jamescicio

    jamescicio Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Oh this one is good :)) . Please make mobs harder to kill so characters like Agility sm , ebk will be recognized . Make kundun impossible to kill because from what i see it is being farmed ^^.

    Oh please remove the guardian and reset the castle . That should be interesting .
     
    DARKSEID likes this.
  8. Gavileitor

    Gavileitor Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2012
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why u want reset of castle?
     
  9. DARKSEID

    DARKSEID Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How exactly would removing guardian benefit only the castle holder when all players can use it simply by voting?? The playing field is even in terms of who can use the guardian angel, what you say doesn't make sense james. players who pk will pk the same lol... the numbers wouldn't be any different with angel or without it.

    I agree with james about kundun and boss mobs, they are supposed to be hard and require a very strong party to beat. It will also add incentive to have more class diversity ie agism/ebk/ee, and not just 1EE+3RF with angel vs BOSS.

    If absorb cannot be fixed, then this item should be removed unless you guys want 90% rf in the server.
     
  10. jamescicio

    jamescicio Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Well the castle was taken using this guardian angel , which makes a character much harder to kill leading to a much harder defense for the attacker. D'oh o_O , think about it .

    But i guess it doesn't really bother me , since during my life span on blizzard i have seen people switching during castle siege and not being warped back to valley of loren like they should ^_^ while using the guardian ( Cobra , SheHulk , Pingping etc ) .

    So some shameful exploits go on and in this case why should the benefits remain ? A castle taken while using the guardians should be taken away.

    Anyway just a suggestion.

    Peace
     
  11. DARKSEID

    DARKSEID Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you stupid james? Defending/Attacking guild both used guardian angel. D'oh o_O Think about it. There is no advantage. and, Yeah name only characters from 1 ally lol. Look at you, showing how impartial you are once again ^^. There are a lot of players that use this "bug".
     
  12. Gavileitor

    Gavileitor Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2012
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The castle was taken whit spirit ofc but defender use too , fair for all.
     
  13. Hopium

    Hopium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    0
    just disable spirit on siege server is all that needs to be done. crywolf event isn't working and you can kill the dark elf without it, solo. so if it can just be disabled on the siege server this would be the easiest fix while still having it available for users to do other events etc. pvp will have to suffer the insane absorb until gix can get a proper fix since its hardcoded.
     
    wild1988 likes this.
  • Loading...
    Similar Threads - Guardian
    1. atsonesti
      Replies:
      3
      Views:
      1,127
    2. kai
      Replies:
      1
      Views:
      982
    3. eXistenZ
      Replies:
      1
      Views:
      2,300
    4. eXistenZ
      Replies:
      1
      Views:
      4,637
    5. biga
      Replies:
      0
      Views:
      1,093